I'm coming out of blogger hibernation to weigh in on cover art. In general, what I LOVE about historical covers has always been artwork that evokes the period in which it was written.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72d97/72d97319b06987edc398367f6b3bb98cb5cc8e48" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a0ad/5a0ad38c8b563eb0e4bcd48fe9c000e103fbcfd7" alt=""
When it comes to the old-school painted covers, like Golden's first example, I am taken in by ambient lighting in subdued, muted tones, the luxuriant fabric of period costume, and the look of "old". That's the whole reason I read historical in the first place. I don't want technicolor or high definition or the feeling I'm watching something in bluray. I'll turn the TV on if I want that. Give me soft edges and a dream-like fade and let my imagination fill in the blanks.
I do not like female models for historical who:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40569/40569d945a39b16c77b623ae85016affcff8c9ae" alt=""
2. sport a tan if she's supposed to be a southern belle who prized a milky white complexion
3. have that former-braces-wearer, perfectly-straight white-toothed smile, like a commercial for Orbit gum. "Brilliant!"
4. have that modern, angular, gym-member body. Women from different eras seemed softer.
5. are wearing what is trying hard to look period, but seems more like a weird ensemble gathered from a local goodwill prior to the shoot. Wrinkled and all.
Just my opinion. Hope it was worth a chuckle.
I chuckled. I know what you mean. I think we already discussed this, but Judy Miller's newest book SOMEWHERE TO BELONG is gorgeous!
ReplyDelete